It seems like you’re saying that outsourced devs should have as much accountability as home-based devs or the entity Boeing itself. I don’t agree with this. The salary does not reflect that. The work that’s assigned does not reflect that. Anecdotally working with outsourced devs and based from the comments here, no one honestly thinks that.
It seems like you were triggered by the “excuses” part of the post. But what about the rest of it? He made a valid point (which I think you proved) about people using the article to discriminate.
I guess I’m just wondering why you’re making generalizations. I’ve worked with many devs (who weren’t outsourced) who blame everyone else but themselves. I learned to use ‘git blame’ very early on.
You’re right in that the primary focus of the article was not the outsourced devs being Indian. The issue comes from how people respond to such articles, no matter the article’s intention.
I’m not saying that outsourced devs shouldn’t be held accountable for any faults. The point is that there are different degrees of accountability for all parties involved.
The article only chose to focus on one of these groups, which is fine. What’s not fine is HN comments that seem to not realize this.
No matter the salary or experience or contract, outsourced devs/companies shouldn’t be in a position of power to break critical systems on an airplane. (I’m not saying this is what happened with the Max.)