Hacker News Reader

Or is it that you (guys) can't have bigger functions because you impulsively fill them with early returns? So you end up over-engineering things just to avoid bigger functions (because you can't have them because they are filled with early returns). Real question, I don't have the answer, but that question is my take from this discussion.

View on HN

If you don't use early returns don't you end up with functions doing lots of state/variable mutation (within the function)? Thats what I consider the problem with big function and/or not using early returns. You then need to keep track of all those modification. I find it much easier to reason with early returns.

You can certainly over-engineer things just to avoid bigger functions. However from my experience I see that far less than complicated large functions with little care to readability.

don't you end up with functions doing lots of state/variable mutation (within the function)?

Good question. This is true, but this is a programming language bug. In some programming language you can write the equivalent of return if... or return for.... Also note that those intermediate variables add a lot in expressiveness (you're computing result or screensize etc). The mutation is unfortunate indeed but a programming language bug.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com