> thought that was intentional so people wouldn’t treat it like a wired mouse?
The "specific vision" we're talking about here intentionally makes the product harder to use. There is no technical limitation behind the decision, it was purely for aesthetics. If the comment I responded to is correct, then Apple though that people would _forget_ they purchased a wireless mouse to begin with. C'mon.
(actually of course in those days Emacs didn't run on the Mac. The ability to run Emacs convinced me to get a NeXT).
I dislike most things Apple has done recently. But I can understand this one.
It's fine for the trackpad, designed and released together with the mouse, to have the lightning port on the back and be used plugged in, because it doesn't move so there shouldn't be much stress on the cable.