Hacker News Reader

Comment by toomuchtodo | Hacker News Reader

Imagine the equation if the diesel fuel burned had a carbon tax on it, and the electricity (provided by overhead wire) was almost free due to the exceedingly low cost of renewables.

Of course it would be an enormous effort to electrify train lines across America; it should still be done.

View on HN

I've wondered if battery electric multiple unit trains will/would make electrification cheaper since you then don't have to electrify the whole line. You can avoid having to put overhead lines where inconvenient, expensive, or potentially dangerous as well. Like tunnels and stations.

I love this idea, are you thinking a hybrid model? i.e. Overheads where possible, battery to bridge the gaps? that way in some places the trains could charge en-route.

That's exactly what I think is interesting. It's actually an old idea. I think with modern batters the design becomes a lot more viable. There are already some of these in service and more on order.

Found this:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1NpqPP5SMfY

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xxZQeS__6sE

Well, we'll have to look at the cost benefit analysis. It should be done if it makes sense.

Would it be more economically feasible to invest the money into fourth generation nuclear technology and then research solid aluminum batteries that are hot swappable? That would cut down on costs for copper or steel for electrification.

"Enormous effort" and "it should be done" without an economic analysis is generally ill thought out.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com