They mention de-forestation in the article. I do worry that if our next "green" energy source isn't cheaper than oil/coal then the third world will ignore the cleaner alternative.
They mention de-forestation in the article. I do worry that if our next "green" energy source isn't cheaper than oil/coal then the third world will ignore the cleaner alternative.
I mean, it's not like they can freely use coal and gasoline in their huts. It is also more efficient to burn the coal & gas in a plant.
On cellphone towers in the middle of nowhere with no wirelines linking them, a solar panel makes a lot of sense, even if it never recovers as much power as it cost to build. Or on a satellite. Or, apparently, on a shack in rural Africa.
I agree Africa probably could do better with natural gas, oil, hydro, or coal central plants for now, vs. big solar plants, but a combination of cheap big grid power sources and decentralized renewables seems like the best solution. Building out a grid in rural areas isn't really cost effective.