The Racist History Behind Facial Recognition

Twice, as far as I properly read - it wasn't edifying - they used a technique of quoting a scientific researcher and then using a "summarising" sentence that was an extreme and unsupported version of what was actually said. For example:

>"This is because physiognomy is junk science — criminality is written neither in one’s genes nor on one’s face."

... except that's the contention that the science has to prove, asserting as a fake summation doesn't make it true.

There are some interesting thoughts in there however.

If statistics and physiognomy reveal uncomfortable truths about our society, we should be receptive to the issues and proactively work towards positive solutions, rather than sticking our heads in the sand. This is fake news.