Should I compare it to "Golang Dependency Hell Claimed My Project?"
> For that comparison to work, java would have needed to only have checked exceptions, with some added language features to deal with them cleanly, and then it might actually have been a viable design.
Why? That's not what happened with Golang's error handling?
As someone just learning Go, what is Golang Dependency Hell?
also google: we don't have that problem at google, so it's not a problem
Of course you can. But it would be hilarious considering Java Module system (Jigsaw) which took decade in making still does not support versioning. People are left to use bloated crap like Maven or Gradle. But since these products are called "enterprise grade" developers are not supposed to call them crap that they really are.
What exactly is "bloated crap" about maven? It works exactly as advertised and a heck of a lot better than go modules/vgo.
If you say XML you lose (it is a config fmt get over yourself...). If you say it downloads the world I suggest you look at the output scroll by on any decent sized project in Go land.
So enlighten us all please with your wisdom.
"Besides that Mrs. Lincoln, how was the play?"