https://github.com/peterluhub/xsm/blob/master/xsm.js
The package only exposes 9 functions, and the naming is mostly consistent. There's no benefit to publicly nitpicking function names in something with such a small API.
The package only exposes 9 functions, and the naming is mostly consistent. There's no benefit to publicly nitpicking function names in something with such a small API.
Edit: for those who disagree and downvote. Not only gp's comment doesn't adress the core issue and is a direct attack to the developer, but it cannot even be accepted as valid and helpful criticism. His point b says that it is possible that the developer doesn't value consistency, while his point a says he might be consistent with short naming. These remarks make it look more like random possible remark than ones that are really specific about this project.