It's the biggest by relative percentage difference but in absolute terms it's second to salary. I'm not sure it's a useful measure. It exaggerates the effect when one number is small as seen with autonomy. I agree with GP, it looks peculiar.

Inclusive workplace has an absolute difference of 10% but has a relative difference of 171%.

Salary has an absolute difference of 15% but has a relative difference of 43%.

Presumably the relative difference for flat organization (0% and 2%) would be larger.

Well if 0.1% men cared about something, and 1% women cared about it -- that's 10x difference in that priority.

But still a blip overall, that can be ignored.

Seems like this aligns with my intuitions about what people care about.

"Inclusivity" doesn't mean anything by itself, it's a synonym for diversity, and these terms themselves essentially mean bias in favour of women. Large majorities of both men and women want to be measured on merit, not many want to feel like they got a job or promotion because of their gender. So no surprise it's not popular and indeed, never has been. The trend towards it is because a small minority care about it more than anything else and go on the attack if they don't get it. The silent majority doesn't care.