So you don't know, or aren't aware of any existing scientific theory, therefore it's magic?
The attention schema theory: a mechanistic account of subjective awareness, https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.0050...
So you don't know, or aren't aware of any existing scientific theory, therefore it's magic?
The attention schema theory: a mechanistic account of subjective awareness, https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.0050...
Possibly magic, would depend on your definition of "magic".
It's odd to see tech-minded people comment on this, because for us, every 0 and 1 is controllable and we hopefully get the expected output.
And here we are commenting on this "thing" that we clearly understand because X, Y, and Z study that affirms our beliefs says it's so.
I digress.
And don't get me started on solipsism. In that case, I'm not real and this comment is, because it has to be.
No one is claiming to understand. In fact the whole point of the article is about how much we don't understand the problem.
Don't take that as flippant.
Laws do not create laws.
Want a brainfuck? Sorry for the language. Prove to me that I did not create you.
No laws of physics, no time ... nada.
Now you get to post on HN ... and you have the hubris to state "because, science" ... seriously ...
Science has been given to you ... from where, exactly?
Or you.