Does every news report of a specific heat wave require a connection to global climate change?
https://www.wsj.com/articles/usda-report-sees-dire-climate-c...
> Midwest farmers are being punished by adverse weather this year. Extremely wet weather this spring left many unable to fully plant their crops, and now summertime heat could kill a sizable portion of the plants that managed to sprout. The USDA is still determining how many acres will be left unplanted as a result of this year’s tough weather, but estimates place unplanted acres as high as 15 million for corn—well above the 2013 record of 3.6 million corn acres.
> Grain prices have risen since weather problems during the planting season began to surface in May. Corn futures on the Chicago Board of Trade have risen 16% since May 1, while soybean futures are up 3%. According to Mr. Crane-Droesch, the models used by the ERS show that farmers are in for more difficult springs as climate change gets more severe.
For example, look for a single news article about the Houthi's in western media that doesn't contextualise them as "Iranian backed" or "Iran linked"
It would be like saying that because increased wealth inequality drives increased crime, that every single crime report should have boilerplate at the end saying that this crime was caused by wealth inequality.
In contrast, there's only one Houthi group, and they are Iran linked, so that is a much more accurate contextualization.
You'd think that would count as evidence.
And for the Houthi one, is it relevant to post every single time they're mentioned? Note that non-Western media doesn't consider it important (look at Chinese, Russian or even Al Jazeera).
> Researchers compared the current high temperatures with historical records from seven weather stations, in different parts of Europe.
>Their preliminary report found that the "signal of climate change is unambiguous," in this summer's heat.