“Narrow view” seems unqualified without more about how the studies are actually excluding other entrepreneurs from the findings. Point of the article seems obvious just from the headline, and then there is the body of supporting text too that seems to say that entrepreneurs are not all that special in knowledge or biologically.

The obvious extension of this point is that entrepreneurs require no special treatment, favoritism, or perks in exchange for exceptional entrepreneurial traits to coax them to your territory of taxation (or whatever).

Instead you might consider developing your current population by increasing their access to capital, resources, connections and safety nets to enable new business ventures based on their proposals to meet a real need that turns a sustainable profit and creates jobs at all salary levels (not just the bottom). No need to provide additional support to just any millionaire/billionaire that will do nothing productive except seek to extract rents from those with less means.

I'd say this could probably give some people a way of looking at things, the environment they live in and that privilege is often there even though it's tabu / taken for granted.

At the same time, I find this to be true for a small type of entrepreneurship. My barber, the local store, my favorite restaurant is not really connected to privilege and everyone of them has gotten where they are anyways.