I meant that UEFI doesn't have a BASIC interpreter (though probably someone has written one).
I did not know that bootOS had one, but it does not surprise me given everything else I read on this thread.
I did not know that bootOS had one, but it does not surprise me given everything else I read on this thread.
You wrote something else:
> Yes, BootOS very much in the same space as MS-DOS, although leaning even further on the "less-is-more" axis. It does the same basic things (though I suppose it doesn't do the BASIC thing).
I thought I caught the error and deleted the erroneous response in time. But I didn't.