Call it what it is: White nationalistic terrorism, don't sugar coat it and call it "extremists".
Here's my take:
The FBI calls people involved with the earth liberation front "ecoterrorists". I don't think most people in the ELF would deny that their efforts are motivated by environmentalism, or oppose the "eco" label being applied to those efforts.
The "extremists" described here would probably not say that they were motivated by "white nationalism" or a desire to ethnic cleanse non-white people. No doubt there are some of those out there, but certainly you couldn't describe the pizza gate attacker in that way, nor would they self-describe that way.
I think the vague "extremist" label might be about as good as you could do, seeing as how unrelated some of these things are. You might be able to call it "right-wing extremism" but then you're making things partisan, and it's understandable that the FBI wouldn't want to do that.
The violence is already manifesting.
They are both violent. But terrorism is not just violence. Terrorism doesn't have to be violent although most often is.
Q Anon seems to be more of a 'think tank' or even an idealism.
How exactly do you make the jump to 'white nationalist terrorism'? Because they seem to be against the left? Against corruption? Can you link anything that would tie the two together? If you legitimately can, I'd love to read and research it.
I'm not pro-antifa or Q anon, but your comment seems to be mental hopscotch with no legitimate foundation on facts.
I’m not sure why people keep claiming the FBI doesn’t investigate Antifa. I guess it doesn’t fit in with the QAnon conspiracy theory.
Again, I'm only seeing a snap judgement and a quick fired response made in haste while interjecting hyperbole.
"Call it what it is: White nationalistic terrorism, don't sugar coat it and call it "extremists"."
My understanding is that QAnon does not march around and say "HERE WE ARE WE ARE QANON!" so to say they are 'white nationalistic terrorist' is an assumption. That type of language is very reminiscent of what Antifa spouts off, especially in the regards of "if you don't agree with me you are racist". There are far too many that have the spotlight of the media attention right now that follow this mindset.
It is possible to disagree with someone and NOT be a racist, a bigot, a xyzphobe...or even WHITE.
The majority of the media have lost the unbias and reporting of facts, and for everyone, this is a damn shame.
Data, give us the data. Let us decide. Don't cram an agenda down our throats. Regardless of what side of the isle you're on, weather you sit or stand to pee, or how close to the equator your were born.