X-ray imaging on a finger is virtually harmless. Using a tuning fork to vibrate a potentially broken bone and causing a patient to feel pain is not harmless.
If a doctor has a treatment with 80% efficacy that costs $1,000, and another with 90% efficacy that costs $100,000, there is nothing immoral about giving the patient the choice. "Doing Harm" would be prescribing treatment that leaves the patient worse off than they started.
I don't see what harm the tuning fork would have caused me beyond a moment of pain which would show that it was worth my time to get an X-ray.
Feeling a bit of pain is not the worst thing in the world. One time I had a tiny cavity on a lower molar, and my dentist offered to drill and fill it without anesthetic. He said that of course I was welcome to get a shot or two of novocaine as we'd normally done. But the lower jaw takes so much time to recover, and he'd had a small cavity of his own filled without novocaine and it was nice to be immediately back to normal.
He also knew that I was fairly tolerant to pain and he probably wouldn't have made the suggestion otherwise. So I took him up on it, and sure enough, it really hurt for a few seconds. But I had a completely normal mouth when I left the office. None of the usual drooling and tongue biting for the rest of the day. I went right out for a nice lunch!
So that was another tradeoff I was glad for, and hopefully these decisions are mine to make.
I bet hundreds of dollars a month would provide depression and anxiety relief for a significant portion of the population.
If you think money relieves anything—regardless of the amount—you're quite mistaken.
Robin Williams was a literal multi-millionaire, and if money relieved anything, he'd still be here.
Context: I have a long-term anxiety condition (GAD+OCD).
I wish they'd do technical/industrial things in a similar fashion. Make appointment, bring piece, get xray, wait a few minutes, leave with xray image/dataset. For cheap. Require bagging for contamination reasons.
And you cannot opt out!
Together with your spouse you have to pay insane 19200 Euro annually!
No wonder it is between 10 and 15 Euro for a finger. In USA if you pay $20000 you will be fully ensured and you will not need to pay anything for your finger check.
Oh my sweet summer child.
Half of which is paid by your employer. If you earn less, you pay less and still get access to the same health care.
> Together with your spouse you have to pay insane 19200 Euro annually!
Only if they also earn as much. If they don't work, your don't pay anything to insure them.
> And you cannot opt out!
Employees earning more than 60k and freelancers can opt out of the system.
> No wonder it is between 10 and 15 Euro for a finger.
With insurance you don't pay anything for getting your finger checked. That was the price without insurance (full bill including consultation would be probably 50€ or so).
Wrong. Your employer covers only 50% of base KV part and excludes PV and other extras. Take 14.6% from 55000 and divide it by 2 to see what your employer covers.
https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SH.XPD.CHEX.GD.ZS?locat...
You are send there by your GP if the GP determines you need it checked like that. They write it down, give you a form, and the specialist uses it to bill the insurance (as they don't pay if you just show up at the X-Ray place directly).
Also a full hand, including the palm, is less than 10€ more I think. It's really not that expensive (a Finger was the cheapest I remember finding).