Selfie-seeking Instagrammers are ruining the world’s beautiful places
cbc.ca
cbc.ca
Park your car where you are supposed to, stay on the trail, don't use a drone if it's not allowed, carry out your trash, don't feed the animals, don't leave your toilet paper under a tree, etc.
Sure I get annoyed when people take too long to snap their photo, but I also get annoyed at people at the grocery store, on the train, etc. You just have to deal with it and go on with your life! Just because some one else likes to take pictures, doesn't mean you should shame them for being a "millennial influencers". But we all should shame the people who don't follow the rules (and these people have been around since before instagram).
This is only true for a very limited definition of "anywhere". You can go to Yosemite in the peak season and easily find places where you can't even see another person.
Anonymize (hide) the metrics and watch this attention seeking plunge.
Do you think anyone is out there "seeking likes" for the sake of likes? If we hide likes and views, who would we be hiding them from? Third parties, or the person making the content? If the former, then the person making the content is still getting a dopamine rush. If the latter, then the audience will have a button that they're not sure if it does anything when they click it. If both, then someone will still find a way to track these things due to the outcome of the algorithm used to sort content to trending or not.
Oh, wait wait wait, no, let me guess, you want the idea of popular content to be thrown away completely and have the pseudo-communist overlords of silicon valley to select what is or is not trending manually?
Like, what possible solution do you think there is to this other than just leaving the system be as it is and being content with the fact that humans are humans?
If they were posting things to a virtual void the great majority would quickly decelerate the rate of this behavior.
It isn’t so bad when it’s a group of five or ten being smart or crass and obnoxious within that limited group. The amplification via Twitter makes that unbearable. I agree the metrics do ultimately drive this behavior too.
Personally I think the converse would be more effective hide the score from the uploader. People upload to gauge their popularity (via image proxy).
Basically I don’t think the issue is, hmmm, what pic got the most likes, do I can get likes too. It’s let me see how many likes I can get on my pic. Obviously people will copycat to go for reproducibility of likes, but are mostly interested in the likes.
I mean if you kill the comments (ignoring "likes and views"), nobody would post anything on Hackernews. Engagement and community building are how message boards and social networks function...
If you can create a feedback loop, people will use that loop to use that loop to get positive feedback. Unless you eliminate comments entirely, people will keep doing this. And if you remove the counts from your platform, you're just opening yourself up to have a secondary service provider create those metrics and sell them to influencers instead of being able to monetize them yourself.
Again, there's no advantage for a social network to kill its ability to create a community and content on its own. It goes against the model. You want to make this a bigger discussion about corporate responsibility and whatnot, that's a worthwhile conversation. But saying "keep the social platforms, but kill the social part unmeasurable" is a weird place to take it to.
What I find irritating are situations where lovely places become semi-professional photo shoots en-masse, where each group are spending hours trying to get the perfect shot, over and over, with lots of time reviewing the footage before deciding again it’s not quite right.
I started asking myself, are we experiencing, or Instagramming?
I've always hated being in pictures, but I wish there were more of my everyday life growing up (including my 20's) to show my son. Digging through my grandparents house and seeing 1000's of photos of fireworks, parades, etc I know what you mean, just enjoy it. But slice of life photos of my grandpa being a young father to my mom and aunts/uncles gives an interesting perspective I'm very glad was captured.
I spent a few weeks in Japan years ago and my favorite photos are the ones with me and other people just bullshitting around. There are probably 1000 photos of mountains, temples,paths, and animals that are essentially meaningless now. I've tasked myself on my last few vacations to ask for more photos, and to try and get as many candid ones as possible, while refraining from taking a bunch of "desktop background" photos I'll never use.
A concern I have now is many of those slice of life photos are being lost to cloud services that shut down (is flicker a thing? did it ever have an e?) or deliberately destroyed as part of snapchat's principle design. I'll get off my soapbox and let be, and just get some hardcopy photos so when my son is digging through my house, maybe he sees something equally interesting.
i generally agree with person being interviewed and opine that travel is cheap as hell and the externalities aren't really captured at all - environmental ruin, local destinations ruined for those who actually live there, none of this is accounted for.
one example are bachelor parties in cheapish locales - you're not gonna see most of this on the 'gram, but you can bet the jokers renting the airbnb against local laws are going to be annoying as hell for the people living in the building
i think more and more locales are either going to ban or are going to tax the hell out of this and all it entails (Airbnb, lodging for non-residents, ....). and yeah, sure there are millions of other places in the world, have at it, as long as it's not here - or you're paying out the nose for it, and that $$ is being used to improve local stuff/offset environmental impact
'Back in the day', you would go on holiday, take a camera and a few rolls of film, snap some photos, and then return home. Perhaps a few days later you might find some time to go and get the film developed. You'd return and get your photos, ready to be shared with friends and family. You'd then set a date, you'd call your loved ones and invite them over for dinner or drinks so you could share your experiences and discuss your photos together. It was a face-to-face, real, personal experience.
Contrast that with the rapid-fire creation and consumption of photos on social media today and you can see how these 'moments' have become more trivial and feel less valuable.
I'm not saying one is inherently better than the other. There are pros and cons to both, but something tells me that if we're talking about "connection" between people, about authentic sharing between friends/family, the older way was better.
More often than not, 'liking' photos on social media ends up being a 'quid pro quo' so that you can get a 'like' in return down the line. There have been studies that show us that social media consumption has a negative effect (especially on younger audiences) on the mental wellbeing of users. Friend counts, likes and shares end up becoming a form of gamification where people chase numbers rather than real meaningful connections.
That is how we ended up in this scenario, where users flock to destinations to simply grab a photo, without ever really taking in their surroundings, just so they can keep up with the Joneses online.
Don't get me wrong, I don't completely blame the tech, the biggest part of the problem is the human condition and the ways we behave - and that aspect hasn't really changed much since we used cameras with rolls of film in them to today - we're still the same, attention-seeking people we were before, but the tech today just amplifies these traits.
I've seen tons of old broken glass and aging trash in the desert. A good amount of southern California has been paved over. Most of the northeast US is private land and the spaces in between given over to vehicles.
Yeah this new wave of disrespect isn't great, but it is nothing new and I don't think the focus should be shaming the instagram selfie crowd. General respect and teaching is still the way to go.
So the farmer put up a big signs telling people to take pictures outside the field etc. Queue the German/Chinese boomer who conveniently 'did not notice it'... People are just trash
i don’t mind either when you see a big picture spot at a famous location and there’s a line of people waiting to get that best pic. if you made the journey out there and want to spend an extra 10 mins to come home with something that will help you remember it and look awesome at the same time, by all means go for it
This is not what they're being publicly shamed for. They're being shamed for trespassing, trampling, damaging the locations and littering.
"Today, the almost 5,000 daily visitors to Maya Bay have contributed to the area’s eroding natural beauty, threatening local marine wildlife and sustainability of the ecosystem. Issues like boat anchoring, an excess of pollutants and sunscreen, and irresponsible tourist behaviors have led to a major decline of the coral reef system in the area, according to Andrew Hewett, a spokesperson for the Phi Phi Island Conservation and Preservation Group"
https://theculturetrip.com/asia/thailand/articles/this-beach...
https://www.suretravel.co.za/blog/thailand-restricts-mass-to...
It was just a lot more expensive.
People used to go with their cameras and invite their friends and family to a slide show when they returned for all the same reasons.
Now that the bottom 95% has the wealth and tools to do it, it’s somehow bad and we’re finding ways to keep them out of these experiences that used to be unavailable.
Everyone else was ashen faced after an exhausting day of horridness.
I wondered about saying something but decided not to.
Especially if this was after she saw that huge pile of human hair they have in Auschwitz.
I accidentally went to a concentration camp in the Czech Republic without knowing what I was letting myself in for. Sure the sign said 'concentration camp' but I was just cycling by and in need of an excuse to stop, so I took the turning and went in. I hadn't heard of this one before - it was the one the Nazis showed to the Red Cross to show that all was well when it was not. I wasn't quite teenage at the time, but definitely young and ignorant.
My mistake was to offer to take a photo for some American tourists that were there. They seemed to be taking selfies so I just 'helpfully' offered to click the button for them whilst they 'smiled'.
This was obviously insensitive, but I had just casually arrived at the place with no thought. Meanwhile the tourists I had tried to help had planned this visit for months (if not years) and they had lost their whole extended family in Theresenstadt and other places where 'Arbeit Macht Frei'. There is something iconic about ironwork that says that, an impulse to take a photo definitely exists.
But it is all very different if you go there because 'this place looks interesting' rather than because you have thought it through. I learned as much from getting it wrong with offering to help someone with their camera as I did from seeing the bunk beds and barbed wire. I expect your teenage girl pouting learned a lot too.
It's kind of a bummer that you have to plan so far ahead for some things. Grand Canyon permits are done during a 1-week opening 5 months before the calendar month you hike in, for example. It's challenging to organize a group when you have kids, jobs, etc. that could change in that time.
Each day, dozens of young brides from every corner of the planet must wait to pose on the scenic steps with blue domes that is present in everyone’s consciousness, in the split-seconds when the shot is free of crowds.
Watching that scene play out over and over, and the general anxiety level of everyone involved, I found to be quite fascinating.
Everyone was working very, very hard to recreate the popularized conception of the experience, rather than just being mentally-present in an otherwise pretty place.
The gamification of travel via social capital never sat well with me.
I guess I wouldn't mind this if it meant we became more receptive to making life decisions to help preserve the environment, but it seems like the outcome is mostly just about getting addicted to upvotes/likes on digital platforms. Ah well.
"Super Sad True Love Story is the third novel by American writer Gary Shteyngart.[1] The novel takes place in a near-future dystopian New York where life is dominated by media and retail." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Super_Sad_True_Love_Story
An incredible tool with side effects people aren't yet capable of dealing with.
The problems with social media mainly exist because we have always on internet and a very good camera in the palm of our hands.
If it were a layer more difficult many of these issues go away.
That said I don't think its socially possible to put it back in the bag, so we'll probably have to simply invent a bigger distraction.
You could also try to make lemonade here though. If the demand is there offer a private tour of the fields for $40/ea. Let them take better pictures than the roadside people with the sign and make some cash.
Wonder if there are ways to disrupt digital lenses while being innocuous to human eye.
https://spectrum.ieee.org/tech-talk/consumer-electronics/aud...
[0] - You may or may not receive a cease and desist order from Sony/ATV.
There are comments in all threads talking about how they're not good things to be posted and talked about, but these don't fit with what I feel HN should be about.
Title fixed to remove implication that this is somehow 1- a new problem 2- "young people ruining things"