Hacker News Reader

Multiple Problems

* Which endocrine disruptors? Many are known, even more are unknown

* Timing of exposure matters more than amount. Tiny doses of substances which are safe for adults will damage you if you are an embryo at the right phase.

* What can you do with this information once you have it?

View on HN

Most emerging contaminants have no clinical reference levels for safe vs. unsafe exposure, so often the best you can do is compare your exposure level to a reference distribution to see if you have relatively high levels.

The CDC tests thousands of people in the U.S. every two years for a panel of chemicals (including endocrine disruptors) via NHANES, so at very least you can compare your results to that to see if you are unusual relative to a nationally representative sample of Americans.

nothing in your reply addresses anything the OP asked.

Not sure why you say that. If somebody was to market a test for endocrine disruptors and persistent organic pollutants they would have to specify what you are testing for, what thresholds to use, etc.

They were asking about any test at all. The answer kind of muddies the problem by implying it is harder than it seems, except the current situation is nothing exists at all. The stated problem was not at all that it wasn't qualitatively adequate.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com