It's not up to The New Yorker to give praise to moderators or owners. That's inserting bias.
It's up to the readers (us) to determine whether the moderators are doing a good job.
It's up to the readers (us) to determine whether the moderators are doing a good job.
Are you implying that this article was trying to be bias-free? The author spent entire paragraphs just cherry-picking "toxic" things that have been said on HN to make discussion here look bad.