Hacker News Reader

Buzzword Bingo? It's a strange statement that is maybe trying to attract investors that are looking to invest in those categories of companies and exclude others. Might as well just throw in a lot of jargon at that rate.

A laudable goal? Of all the statements to bemoan, why choose the one about environmental sustainability?

These are buzzword marketing goals, and usually unachievable without ridiculous costs, assuming they're even attempted.

Going meatless would save money, if anything. Recycling or buying multi-use containers also eventually costs less than single use, especially at scale.

Also, credit where it's due to We. Just because the common opinion of this company is negative, doesn't mean literally everything they do is bad.

I don’t buy that it’s “unachievable” at all.

> carbon emissions free

Are they not using concrete in all the buildings they're building around the world?