Imagine if they did the same thing to help nature. I am not even talking about sending their people, just the mobilisation of politics to act on important subjects.
Til we forget the "my lawn, your shit" way of thinking shit will be going south
Imagine if they did the same thing to help nature. I am not even talking about sending their people, just the mobilisation of politics to act on important subjects.
Til we forget the "my lawn, your shit" way of thinking shit will be going south
This situation is entirely different. You are missing a lot of the nuance here. Brazil is a huge country which supplies many countries with countless commodities and other products. External military intervention would only make the situation worse.
This is not how international politics work.
I'm definitely not in favour of what has happened in Iraq, but brute-forcing every problem with external intervention makes absolutely no sense.
In this case, it's reasonably clear that this situation is awful, but if we start turning everything into B/W and ignoring the value of dialogue soon we'll run into other more nuanced disagreements being solved through violence.
> external intervention
We are all internal to the same world/nature.
I understand people are disillusioned with politicians everywhere in the world but we should not abandon politics because of that.
A world green police sounds great (better than a world oil reserve police atleast) but that requires a world government to come up with the authority and solution that does not result in suffering.
It's not going to work if the country you live in is secluded from the world and is exploiting the resources of the world for the commodities and relative fortune.
So you want to invade Brazil to stop them burning their forest?