As we are now living in a "reality show" world, maybe. But if such decision is based on scientific, ethical, and clinical rational, that is very unlikely. The details of his work were sloppy and unethical including, (not exhaustive): He generated mutations in CCR5 that are uncharacterized. That is he didn't even use the 'delta 32' mutation observed in the gene pool). Beyond that, there is not solid rational that the kids are at risk for HIV transmission sufficiently to justify any procedure, let alone an unconsented, germ-line genetic modification. The physicians that ran the Tuskegee Studies thought they would be lauded. That hasn't happened and won't.