I really don't care about the decoration of this guy's office, which drugs he prefers, how his voice sounds, the atmosphere in a horse racing venue, the outcome of a specific horse race, not even this guy's entire life story.
What was his key invention?
Edit: Skimmed the rest, and it sounds like he was simply good at statistical analysis.
Other key parts of the article seem to be (remember, I skimmed): It was a betting system where effectively people bet against each other, not a bookmaker with fixed odds, so he basically became a bookmaker.
The rest reads like many other "smart gambling" stories:
- others invested in his operation
- he first was treated as a good customer, getting an "API" to place the bets programmatically, then got that revoked as the organizers realized that other gamblers might not like that he was winning so much (from them, effectively)
Overall, I learned nothing new, and wasted my time reading ten pages of drivel. This is why I hate long-form journalism: You don't know whether the article contains any useful information until you've spent half an hour trying to find it in the description of people's looks, landscapes, weather, and similar chaff.