The Cover-Up Culture
steveblank.com
steveblank.com
He was presented the results by HR and just about flipped. If he had known who had said what, someone might have lost their job. Not having someone to single out, he just all berated us together - not the sort of boss behavior the survey was supposed create. From then on, I went back to my usual method of marking everything "perfect" and leaving no feedback text.
Survey feedback can easily drift upwards: as a few people start scoring 'great' more often than necessary, everyone else needs to start scoring average workers as great to ensure they aren't left behind. Eventually anything less than perfection indicates total failure.
At appraisal time, you pick 3 cow-orkers to give you "feedback". Everyone stitches this up with their mates; if you tried to be honest - because no-one's perfect - you'd effectively be punished by having the lowest score of your peers!
As a result, the website never improves or really evolves with the current trends in web development. It really makes me wonder about the usefulness of having a website if the cover-up culture is valued more than accurate reporting, even if that reporting isn't always the story that upper-management would like to hear.
It's very, very easy to go down the wrong route on this, it's important to build up a strong culture of honesty and engineering integrity and that starts with people in leadership positions (which may not be people in the highest management positions).