seems like a slightly unwarranted conclusion.
alternative conclusion: "Ultimately, people will submit to living under a roof if they are relocated by state goons seventy five times."
seems like a slightly unwarranted conclusion.
alternative conclusion: "Ultimately, people will submit to living under a roof if they are relocated by state goons seventy five times."
I'm not trying to be flippant here; I think we walk a dangerous line when we presume to know what's best for a person and especially when we apply pressure to get them to change their ways.
one of my good friends from high school developed severe schizophrenia after graduating and has been homeless for several years now. he has a standing offer of support from his (wealthy) parents on the sole condition than he start some form of treatment. I and some of our other friends have repeatedly tried to help him get into housing, treatment, or even temporary shelter, and he always refuses. his parents had him involuntarily committed for a few days; he left as soon as he was able. when I run into him and ask how he's doing, he always says he's doing great and loves the freedom of his lifestyle. he doesn't look great, but is it really up to me to decide?