Here's the secret sauce of Heroku: I know how to set up servers. I don't want to.
Paying for convenience is always a good business model.
Here's the secret sauce of Heroku: I know how to set up servers. I don't want to.
Paying for convenience is always a good business model.
This.
I really wish that the Pantheon folks would scale up and open up their platform to generic PHP apps. It's everything I want setup and ready to go: Varnish, Apache, MariaDB, PHP5 APC, Memcached, Solr, Hudson all on one box, configured for dev, staging and prod environments, and managed via git and Hudson for deployments and automation.
Edit: Forgot to add that the best part about the Pantheon service is that while you can use it as a total SaaS like Heroku, it's also 100% hackable, you have root on the box, and can change anything that you want to, quite an amazing idea (have to see how their support issues pan out).
I imagine you could save a lot of money by optimizing apache/mysql rather than using the default configuration Heroku sets.
But I don't want to. Like Steve above, I can set up a server, but I really don't want to deal with that stuff. Heroku's value-add to me is that my time is better spent on being a software engineer than being an ops engineer. That value-add is worth the extra money.
> I imagine you could save a lot of money by optimizing apache/mysql rather than using the default configuration Heroku sets.
I really doubt this, that's why. Their entire life is making reliable systems for applications. Mine isn't. They know waaaaay more about this than I do.