> By planning to support DNS-over-HTTPS, Mozilla is throwing a monkey wrench in many ISPs' ability to sniff on customers' traffic and filter traffic for government-mandated "bad sites."
But I don't see why they can't offer their DoH, it seems their issue is with Cloudflare not with DoH per se
I'm assuming the DoH servers used by British users are physically in the UK. (I believe they anycast the service from all of their edge locations, and they have several in the UK.)
So the fact that Cloudflare doesn't have to comply with this law is precarious. Is it because only ISPs are required to comply? If so, it seems like a matter of time before Parliament amends the law to require any public DNS operator to implement the filters as well.
That means that the ISP dns will 100% be logging all requests made.
The risk of Cloudflare doing it is far outweighed by ISPs legally being required to do it, at least in Australia.
Difference being if I connected to ISP ABC's DoH server - communication between will be encrypted, but the actual requests will be logged after they receive the request.