I'm not really concerned about RMS. I just pointed out that he isn't about "open".
To the extent that you're fond of free software and RMS, that's nice, but the topic is TFA.
To the extent that you're fond of free software and RMS, that's nice, but the topic is TFA.
For anyone reading this that don't know what we're on about , read --> http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/open-source-misses-the-point.h...
(edit: I generally agree with RMS's points. I might confuse "open" and "free". For anyone not native to English these words might be interchangeable. I'm not a native English speaker. It becomes clearer when you define the words such as done in http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/open-source-misses-the-point.h... , but in a day to day conversation, it's easy to get the exact definitions wrong)
No, we're not discussing one thing vs. another, we're discussing different things. That is a whole other situation entirely.