> Public libraries are engaged in one of the most valuable series of community services for all ages, for all audiences
> If you think about equitable access to information for everybody, there shouldn’t be discrimination or anything like that
Devil's advocate: the article (and many of the persons mentioned) seem to be discussing primarily works of fiction, not e.g. textbooks or technical reference books. How is this part of "a valuable series of community services"? It seems like they just want the ability to consume more entertainment media for free, and are trying to disguise it as part of the (noble) effort of trying to make access to information egalitarian.