You are not the only one. "Says more about you then it..." blah, blah, blah. The fact is, Asciicker is not a word, is absolutely weird phonetically and asslicker is a close appearing viable compound word. Good for those so pure of mind they do not see it.
Weird phonetically?
ASCII spells like ask-he, so it should read as asskicker.
Pretty phonetically sound, no?
in what font does 'ii' look like 'li' ?
Seriously? Any font that only separates the line from the dot with 1 or 2 pixels. Especially if you're only glancing long enough that a c could be mistaken for an l.
If that's the case, shouldn't it look like "ascllcker"?
Are you saying that if someone wrote 'cick my balls' you're not going to think for a brief moment they said something else?
Our minds try to fit uncertain patterns into familiar shapes, like the classic email forward: "Aoccdrnig to rscheearch at Cmabrigde Uinervtisy, it deosn't mttaer in waht oredr the ltteers in a wrod are, the olny iprmoetnt tihng is taht the frist and lsat ltteer be at the rghit pclae. The rset can be a toatl mses and you can sitll raed it wouthit a porbelm. Tihs is bcuseae the huamn mnid deos not raed ervey lteter by istlef, but the wrod as a wlohe."
Yeah, seriously. I can only remember problems discerning characters with the I, l, and 1 in Ariel. Unless there is a kerning problem, I've never had trouble discerning lowercase i and l. Just like I've never had issues discerning b and h. They have similar strokes, but are clearly different.