My experience with all apple products at work has been quite bad so I might be a little biased.
My experience with all apple products at work has been quite bad so I might be a little biased.
"Why would I pay AWS to host a Virtual Machine for me when I can get a physical host on Hetzner for the same price, if not less, that's 5x better?" -- the point has truly been missed.
It's the same thing here: you don't respect the product so you don't understand who would use it, so you don't buy it. That's fair enough.
But the MacPro is designed for a niche audience who are happy with the hardware, implementation, support, and so on. The things they're doing with this product are not things you're doing, so you don't understand their pain points.
How would one gain that knowledge in the first place? We aren't born with the knowledge of why one would buy this machine over another.
We gain that knowledge based on specifics of the two machines. So the question is simple: what specifically makes the new Mac Pro a more desirable purchase option for someone than a PC with similar specifications?
Intel is old news on HEDT ever since Threadripper became a thing. The final nail in that coffin will be the November release of the third-gen Ryzen Threadripper making that 28 core Xeon obsolete. I'm curious if the new Mac Pro will even be available by then.
AMD builds admirable video cards, but the Radeon VII is inferior for professional work compared to Nvidia cards and CUDA.
MacOS is superior to Windows but inferior to Linux. A lot of people with HEDT builds are in Linux (myself included). I appreciate being able to do some of my favorite Unixy stuff in MacOS at a fraction of the speed, but for high end use it's still a joke.
I get that Apple has some products that are really good, but for a professional environment I am still unsure if I would really recommend to buy them.