So far all we have his word that he was assured it would be a limit of 5 people and out of state.

There’s no signed contract that he’s produced, and doesn’t remember how many times he donated. It was decades ago, he could easily be misremembering someone saying the “average” donor is used 5 times. It wouldn’t make sense for a standard contract to include those limits either.

I’m interested where this goes. I’m guessing he’s trying public pressure to force a settlement, knowing he’d lose in trial.

Also, if it wasn’t a cash grab, I think he’d have already committed to giving any settlement to those children.