>These vulnerabilities are well documented in open source.
Seeing this awkward use of "open source" a lot lately. Its almost as if people think "readable on the internet for free" equals open source.
Seeing this awkward use of "open source" a lot lately. Its almost as if people think "readable on the internet for free" equals open source.
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.en.html
The “stricter requirements” piece is that the freedom bent sometimes leads towards more restrictive licenses (like GPL)
It is an obscure term but it just isnt old enough or obsolete enough either way for it to be considered an archaic context