Hacker News Reader

Comment by disgruntledphd2 | Hacker News Reader

Yup, if this goes through, we'll need to move all our meetups to email notifications, which will kill virality but given that no-one's going to pay for a meetup, is probably the better solution.

I fucking hate WeWork (i was really worried when Meetup.com was acquired, and it appears that I was correct to be).

View on HN

I would have been OK with We buying Meetup if they offered their space for meetups ... but alas ... they did literally nothing and likely we'll see that the product was killed in the end.

Meetup.com does let organisers book WeWork spaces. Free.

Yeah, they kept hassling me for months trying to get me to use 4-8 people spaces for our meetups which have 60-80 people.

one group i am in uses meetup for event announcements, but manages the event on their own website. it's really just to enable people to find them on meetup. meetup never sees any rsvps except some that rsvp by mistake.

the only thing that virality helps with is event anouncements. finding all events in the same place, that is what makes meetup.com useful. the actual registration, and what not can be done anywhere else without causing to much friction.

For smaller group, people updating attendance is really useful. I've cancelled meetings when not enough people could attend, or change venue if more than I initially anticipated acknowledged. This is not easy to do on a simple github.io style static site.

oh, of course, but it doesn't have to happen on meetup.com, you can use any other service, from the many suggested in this discussion.

of course having two sites is more complex than having it all-in-one. that was the whole benefit of meetup.com, but that benefit is now going away.

one reaction is to reduce the dependency on meetup.com for groups. we need meetup.com to help get the word out, but we can use other tools for the actual group management.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com