More inane pseudoscience about the moronic introvert/extrovert dichotomy. A two week study with 130 students and we’re supposed to learn something? Change our behavior? This is just astrology for people who love Ted talks.
Of course not. Merely a study, done by professionals, and involving 130 students?
As everybody knows the real way to learn something needs a snark layman comment with a facile dismissal!
Why is that dichotomy moronic?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_Five_personality_traits
I find it interesting that the rest of the MBTI is so thoroughly rejected -- in particular, I read in work that accepts the MBTI (uh-oh, red flag!) that males tend to split 75% T / 25% F and females do the reverse, 75% F / 25% T.
It seems to me that this very large difference in responses should be sufficient to show that the T / F axis is capturing something. If the T / F distinction were meaningless, it wouldn't be able to predict anything, but it clearly can predict the respondent's sex.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Myers%E2%80%93Briggs_Type_Indi...
Whether you derive energy from other people or whether they are draining is also dependent a lot on who those other people are and whether you have have social skills currently (e.g. how much effort it takes to you to figure out what to say).