Convincing a generation that witnessed two world wars to back a massive defense project wasn’t difficult.
Convincing a generation that witnessed two world wars to back a massive defense project wasn’t difficult.
That's the standard story. From what I've read though, Eisenhower wanted to build the Interstate Highway System for a number of reasons of which defense was only one--and possibly a fairly minor one. But he knew that playing up the defense angle was a good strategy to get the plan passed.
I can only think of highways as secondary runways for planes but I'm unsure as to how much that helps your case.
The interstate highway system was built in part for military purposes and partly designed by the Army:
So the idea that highways would be useful if there were an imminent threat of nuclear attack looks pretty silly.
Lower Manhattan on 9/11 was evacuated mostly by foot and sea, with over half a million evacuated by boat alone: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maritime_response_following_Se...
>"We offered the city the opportunity to take evacuees out of harm's way," said Amtrak spokesman Cliff Black. "The city declined."
[1] http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/09...