Hacker News Reader

Comment by berns | Hacker News Reader

> Is there a plausible explanation why egress fees from cloud providers costs around $0.1/GB?

Isn't DigitalOcean a cloud provider ($0.01/GB)?. Isn't Oracle a cloud provider (first 10 TB free, $ 0.0085 after)? Isn't OVH a cloud provider (free bandwidth)?

View on HN

Which means higher pricing at GCP/AWS/Azure can't be explained by higher availability, DO offers the same.

Unless I'm making a mistake someplace, Digital Ocean includes 1TB egress to the internet from a $5-per-month host. On Google Cloud Platform that egress would cost $120/month by itself.

https://www.digitalocean.com/pricing/#Compute

https://cloud.google.com/compute/network-pricing

What you find is if you spin up 1000 of these $5 hosts (ie, $5000 per month which is pretty) and try to egress 1PB per month you can't. Either they disconnect you, the systems can't actually handle it or some other gimmick.

One thing folks like about AWS - you can actually know what you will be paying and there is no fake / hidden limits.

That's my somewhat outdated experience wasting a TON of time on this idea ages ago.

But going back to the original number of $0.01/GB, that's what they state upfront as a bandwidth overage cost. I would be very surprised if they disliked customers paying the overage fee. And that's still only $10k per petabyte, vastly cheaper than AWS.

Give them a warning if you're going to spike your bill that high, but there shouldn't be any fake/hidden limits.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com