Fexl: The one programming language that's close to being flawless
fexl.com
fexl.com
Reading the article though, I'd say a good objective argument is made that Fexl is "flawless", insofar as it being the "thinnest possible functional programming layer on top of C." Whether that's useful or good is another matter.
(a (b (c (d (e (f x))))))
(a; b; c; d; e; f x)
Is not required so isn't the thinnest possible layer.Whether it's preferable to a homoiconic s-expr is subjective.