Yup, listen to this guy. I have the top of the line MacBookPro and Luminar is not even barely usable even with nothing else running on it.
The features are ok, but it's basically an unusable product.
I’m more curious if the results are as consistently good as advertised, as usually NN results are cherry picked for good ones.
I mean, it goes further to your point -try it out. It seems that it depends _very_ much on the use cases.
Even inference is going to be slow when working on a 20 megapixel image. That's as much work as a 1220 sample batch at 128x128 resolution.