We'll be finally able to traffic jam free when flying cars become the norm.
From the article:
"they do this through self-imposed speed regulation. When it's moderately busy, for instance, the authors found the ants actually speed up, accelerating until a maximum flow or capacity is reached.
Whereas, when a trail is overcrowded, the ants restrained themselves and avoided joining until things thinned out. Plus, at high density times like this, the ants were found to change their behaviour and slow down to avoid more time-wasting collisions."
We'll be finally able to traffic jam free when autopilot will make us slow appropriately in high density conditions, avoiding accordion-like brake/accelerate/brake cycles
It looks wonderful! Just, please, add the option into your autopilot to let me pass before playing with the best jam-reabsorbing strategy!
I need to go places, not like the rest of you who hit the road just for fun!
No, because each vehicle has different acceleration and deceleration rates. Watch any road with an incline and you will see congestion develop relatively quickly before the incline.
And a traffic jam is inevitable when the bandwidth of a road has been exceeded. Each vehicle needs a certain amount of space in front of it, and behind it. The faster it goes, the more space it is, as well as if it’s heavy. This means for a given number of lanes, at a given speed, there exists a max number of vehicles. Once this maximum is exceeded, speed must drop as it is no longer safe to travel so close to vehicles in front and behind, and so bandwidth also drops. Hence, traffic jam. The different accel/decel rates contribute to the congestion also, as vehicles need varying amounts of time to fill the space in front of them.
Bottom line, there is no solution to traffic jams other than reducing space needed to travel Per person (trains instead of cars), or increasing speeds (not possible in cars on current roads without exceeding acceptable safety risks), increasing the number of lanes (space is usually not available), and the easiest option, reduce the number of vehicles traveling the road via variable tolling based on congestion (currently the best option in my opinion).
Also, I would assume any congestion alleviated would be offset by induced demand by the people who now see less congestion and decide its worth it to jump on the road.
Proportional to the number of people forgoing trips because the congestion sucks. You'll never eliminate all congestion at peak hours but you can make "peak hours" into "peak hour" if you make things more efficient. A more efficient system can also withstand more traffic before things start backing up into each other and it all goes to hell with feedback loops.
Scenarios where individuals are planning their own movement (road traffic, foot traffic in a stadium, etc) can generally be modeled like a plumbing system carrying a highly viscous and compressible material. If you throw every trick in the book at it to make all the "features" (intersections, doorways) efficient you can reap a lot of benefits without actually widening bottlenecks.
Attacking the other parameters of the problem is nice, but not the best use of resources. But perhaps that’s all we can wish for at this point.
Everyone in the USA is required to drive a 6 sqm hybrid Fiat, effective immediately.
In particular, they are working as a team. No single ant has any incentive to move faster than their teammates: the nest will be filled at the same speed, whether she gets there first or others do.
"A microwave-powered aircraft has lifting surfaces for exerting lifting forces on the aircraft in response to the propulsion of the aircraft and a rectenna array for receiving and rectifying microwave energy transmitted to the aircraft from a location remote from the aircraft. An electric motor for driving a propeller is energized by microwave energy received by the rectenna array, which is provided in a body at the underside of the aircraft. The body has its major dimensions extending horizontally and is relatively shallow with a periphery which is vertically curved so as to reduce turbulence in the airstream over the body during flight. The body is separate from the lifting surfaces and shaped to at least substantially avoid the generation of lifting forces by the body."
https://patents.google.com/patent/US4955562A/en
How much energy can a microwave emitter send across how far? If we're talking tens of kilowatts at a distance of 5-10 miles - emitter "turrets" would be situated on towers along a path between cities. Depending on the energy storage method aboard the passenger-ferrying aircraft - the tower would be sending a charge for the duration of a straight flight path travel time of several miles. If the craft has the energy storage for an average 50 miles of travel (70 miles after adding a safety buffer), then every 30 miles the craft would receive a charge behind a shield to protect passengers from intense microwave radiation focused on its rectenna.
If the towers have a range of 5 miles, then that is 10 miles of charging since the craft flies towards, over, and away from the tower. Duration of a charge could increase if the craft has the altitude to glide and thus slow and stop running engines. Microwave induced amperage can increase as the craft gets closer to the source. Since this is for inter-city travel, the towers would be located on empty land where dozens of hectacres of solar panels could provide a local dedicated grid. Night flight may not be feasible unless there is a local dense energy source. We have to consider passenger air travel (likely automated) as traditional traffic, along a straight line, like Coruscant. Multiple towers and emitters at these charging points for high density intersections or for two way "highways".
This could only work if these microwave emitters can send out high energy in a very narrow beam with the turret focusing precisely on the craft. It will kill any living thing in that path. Bird populations. Insect migrations. Unshielded passengers.
Also see:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electrolaser
This type of "fueling station" means less weight required for the flying car's energy storage method. Traffic path charging happens intermittently at flight speeds instead of idled.
... probably just best to use a dense energy source and "fill up while parked" the traditional way before each trip?