> ...I'm certainly on the side of the those with disability.

In your mind, is it possible to be on the side of those with the disability and yet still against the ADA?

Put another way, given the two concrete examples mentioned (UCB and Stanford) did actual people with actual disabilities gain greater access to the content that was taken offline (in order to comply with the ADA)? Lots of laws have good intentions and bad effects. I think we should judge them by their effects, not their intentions.