1. Trusting trustworthy people increases efficiency. The less checking and verification you have to do, the less redundant work there is and the more easily things go.
2. As the number of trustworthy people in a group increases, the value of choosing to trust a random person increases. The odds get greater that they will be trustworthy, letting you reap the greater efficiency of trusting them.
3. As the number of trusting people in a group increases, the relative value of malice increases. The more likely a con artist is to be trusted, the more likely they are to be successful at their goal.
So there's this weird trust graph where as you approach 100% trustworthiness, you also approach 100% exploitability. The group gradually turns itself into a honeypot. So the stable equilibrium point is somewhere less of 100%.
In practice that means trust people once you have confirmed identity and if you’re in a trustworthy legislation.
This is also fundamentally hard, though. As the ratio of trustworthy people increases, the odds of false positives necessarily increase too.
Just as you said, the whole stack is corrupt. There will be more of this to come.
They profit by knowingly breaking the law. They are criminals.
It is appalling that this can happen in a country built on a system of laws.
Bad people only do good things as a means to an end. Usually that end, they believe, will benefit them, and sometimes it does in the short term, but long term, no. The bad things they do are intentional. You can only predict their behavior with statistics. It's not worth it. They never apologize. They say, "You are too sensitive. It's just a joke." But it's not.
Stay good, my friend. Good people will find you. You will find them. They are out there, but they, like me, hide.