But the point here is that there's data that shouldn't be collected in the first place. And that data, especially biometric data, is what allows data autocrats hack human beings. And you don't need a lot of data to hack a human being. Just enough to know someone better than that person knows himself or herself.
I just don't think that's feasible. The cat cannot be put back in the box (so to speak).
I think the solution goes more in line with open transparency. Yet individual privacy is really important.
The only way through, I think, is to guarantee individual privacy but enforce institutional transparency.
It's not feasible because there's a huge economic logic behind that data collection. While the truth is that most services (even innovation) would still work with a few data points.
I mean, Google Maps doesn’t need to collect all the data it collects, but it sells us the benefit with an imminent long-tail of problems.