Hacker News Reader

Comment by Spooky23 | Hacker News Reader

The problem is that you are picking winners at a young age based on bullshit metrics and favoritism.

The kids in the middle get screwed. How would you like to be tracked as only worthy of community college because of how you did in 4th or 5th grade?

View on HN

Why would it have to be a one-time selection? Put kids in a class based on their current level of academic performance. If you're doing better than the other kids in your class then you go to the more advanced class.

Sounds good, but once you’re in the dumb caste you tend to stay.

It's possible the reason for that is that the original assessment was well-calibrated. But if you want to see more opportunities for misidentified students to prove their worth then why not argue for that instead of making every class the dumb class?

I wouldn’t call community college “dumb caste”. The people there are often ready to move upwards (whatever this means for them)

It’s about the high school, not the college.

Kids in this track don’t get access to services, AP classes, etc.

It's a somewhat self fulfilling prophecy though, isn't it? The point of splitting kids out is that it will push them forward academically; by being held back because of their performance at one point, it makes it that much harder to excel further down the line to jump in to an accelerated class.

Why not take the top 20% (or whatever number) of the lower class, and give them a change to go to a higher class? and the same for the bottom 20% of the higher (who maybe aren't able to keep up) to go to the lower class.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com