https://www.acs.org/content/acs/en/climatescience/climatesci...
Also, the big issue with hydrogen as a fuel is that while it has a high energy density per unit mass, it has a very low energy density per unit volume... IE, from an engineering point of view you have to carry a large volume of the stuff to have a vehicle with any significant range.
Discussion of how that could potentially be done here:
https://www.energy.gov/eere/fuelcells/hydrogen-storage
In a way, this sort of research addresses the same problem as improved battery technology - we need mobile energy sources for moving things.
I think a major reason we haven't gotten where we need to go with this problem is that researchers tend to look for a way to replace gasoline - to find another fuel that can simply be used in place of gas/diesel using the same engine technology (and associated control, fuel handling, and other tech).
That's very, very difficult to do, because gasoline is uniquely suited to what we use it for - it has high energy density per unit volume and mass, it's moderately volatile at standard temperature and pressure, and most interestingly we don't have to expend much energy to produce it, because all that energy was stored aeons ago. We just have to get it out of the ground and separate it into usable fractions. It's essentially a "free ride" as far as energy sources go.
It's too bad continual use will destroy us.