But this is exactly the tactic Snopes uses to be able to flip a fact check answer.
In this case, the original claim could have been "most" or "5 out of 6", and changing it to "all" is an easy way to post that big red x.
In this case, the original claim could have been "most" or "5 out of 6", and changing it to "all" is an easy way to post that big red x.
They are not always using the claim sent to them, and they've been busted dozens of times for changing a claim, instead of changing the result. It's selectively choosing which "original" to use.
For actual cases I've already posted:
You keep repeating this claim over and over without any evidence whatsoever that this is happening. Even the cases you've posted have no indication that anything was changed to re-frame a result and yet you keep arguing that they're selectively choosing the question and, on top of that, all of them include an image of the original claim, irrespective of what they chose as the title of their page.
I wonder why a trusted, transparent site would do that...
As with almost all of your other claims, a citation or source is needed.
Edit: On top of that, there are several other archive sites that do, in fact, have Snopes articles linked. So, you tell me... why would Snopes "go after" one archive site and not another?
> This URL has been excluded from the Wayback Machine.
https://web.archive.org/web/*/snopes.com
The Wayback Machine only excludes sites upon request.
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/*
This isn't exactly the type of site I'd usually reference, but this woman recorded quite a few page delta's about gmo food and Monsanto, and the Snopes pages getting edited after large ad buys by the company.
https://foodbabe.com/do-you-trust-snopes-you-wont-after-read...