[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Einstein_notation
[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Penrose_graphical_notation
[3] http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/week79.html ff
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Einstein_notation
[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Penrose_graphical_notation
[3] http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/week79.html ff
Equation 18 in their paper is in Penrose's original paper ("Applications of negative dimensional tensors"). Fun fact: if you take a planar graph, all of whose vertices are degree-3, then interpret them as triple-products/determinants/cross-products, then the absolute value of the resulting scalar is proportional to the number of proper 4-colorings of the regions complementary to the graph. A reiteration of this is in Bar-Natan's paper "Lie algebras and the four color theorem."
However, their contribution seems to be notation for dealing with 3-dimensional derivatives (gradient, curl, and divergence), which are special due to Hodge duality and the existence of a triple product. Equation 30 implying curl of gradient and divergence of curl both being zero is pretty nice.
I think the authors are correct that the specialization of the notation for 3D vector calculus had not been written up yet.
http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/week92.html
and the core proposition goes back to Penrose.
They claim they're making it more accessible with pedagogical examples (and innovations in representing differential vector calculus).
I still prefer index notation. Their notation looks pretty intricate and I think it would be really hard to do long calculations in it. It's also not clear to me how you'd generalise it to non-commutative vector algebras like in quantum mechanics.
https://mathstat.dal.ca/~selinger/papers/papers/graphical-bi...