Of course, this is just a “point-to-point Ethernet” not an allocation.
That said, I think the original intent was that such “point-to-point Ethernets” should have been issued /64, but seems /126 is common practice.
That said, I think the original intent was that such “point-to-point Ethernets” should have been issued /64, but seems /126 is common practice.
* https://www.ripe.net/publications/docs/ripe-690#4-1-2--unnum...