Basically a panel found in favor of an earlier Judge's ruling that because the previous owners charged a fee to enter the property, it isn't a public road/beach, but instead a permitted use road/beach, giving the owner the right to not permit ANYone to enter the property.
There are no private beaches in CA. It's just the road that is private, the beach is public land.
What do you think this article is, some kind of public beach or something?
If you disable javascript, you can read the article.
If you use ublock origin, blocking javascript breaks bloomberg's paywall. You can do that for bloomberg.com (and nothing else) by opening the site, clicking the ublock icon, and clicking the bottom at the far bottom right.
And with the additional advantage that the site loads faster.
Alternatively, using just Firefox: stop (X) the page loading after the content has loaded but before the giant JavaScript bundle has downloaded, and then enter reader mode.
Opening it in a different container (with a right-click) also works.
How ironic. Breaking the paywall on a billionaire's newspaper to read an article about a billionaire's paywalled beachfront.