Hacker News Reader

It was watched with it, though.

No matter what the thing is, someone, somewhere, gets off on it. It's like a reverse Rule 34. (Is there already a rule saying "whatever it is, it's porn for someone"?)

A true movie of life could never be made - it'd be too obscene to get published...

wiki is saying she did stripteases for the camera.

She originally gave access to the stream for free and then later started charging for it. She also originally blocked it during sex but then stopped. Makes me think she had a "people will pay to see me bang" motivation.