And “shelter” is what people like my ex want to provide. Shelters have the locks on the inside, though, and the detention centres have the locks on the outside.
And “shelter” is what people like my ex want to provide. Shelters have the locks on the inside, though, and the detention centres have the locks on the outside.
Because life sucks in many parts of the world. Ever wonder how the borderless utopia your ex supports is actually supposed to scale?
> And “shelter” is what people like my ex want to provide.
She wants to provide it, or she wants others to provide it? How many people is she personally willing to host in her home and materially support?
She wants to provide. And she’d break herself to support as many as possible at her own expense if she could.
If everyone like her was allowed to, there wouldn’t be any cost to anyone else.
Out of interest, why not let the migrants build their own houses? It’s not like houses are a finite resource.
The people who are overly compassionate here are contributing to a human trafficking apparatus that is truly ghastly in its scale.
No, she doesn't want to provide them shelter. She wants to make them citizens, by the millions, with no plan for how our economy and society will integrate them.
If she's really being honest, she'll admit that she's looking to import individuals who will be dependent on the state for support, thus securing a large new voting block for her political party.